SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 MarsdenLR 282

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
CALTEX OIL MALAYSIA LTD – Appellant
Versus
CLASSIC BEST SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Suriyadi J (Now JCA):

[1] This is the plaintiff's appeal against the decision of the sessions court judge dismissing its application for summary judgment under O 26A of the Subordinate Courts Rules 1980. The plaintiffs claim against the defendants in the court below is for the amount of RM218,662.80 being goods sold and delivered.

[2] It is the plaintiff's case that the first defendant had since May 2002 ordered goods from the plaintiff and the plaintiff had delivered the goods to the first defendant, the acceptance of which had been acknowledged by the first defendant, who had placed their company chops on the delivery orders. The delivery orders were duly signed by the first defendant's representatives and addressed to the first defendant. The signature and chop on the delivery orders bear the words 'Received Mentioned Goods in Good Condition and Water Free'. Invoices issued by the plaintiff were addressed to the first defendant.

[3] The second, third and fourth defendants were guarantors by virtue of a letter of guarantee dated 20 March 1997. The first defendant made payment to the plaintiff vide two Bank Utama cheques that subsequently could not be cleared because payment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top