SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 MarsdenLR 131

HIGH COURT MALAYA MELAKA
ONG YAN & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF LAND REVENUE ALOR GAJAH MALACCA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Francis Ho ,Respondent Advocate: Mohamed Raus Shariff

JUDGMENT

Wan Yahya J:

[1] This matter was referred to us pursuant to an application made by the landowner under s 38 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1960. The land in question (referred to as the acquired land) is a freehold rubber plantation about 13 acres 0 Rood 9 Poles in area situated in the Mukim of Masjid Tanah, Malacca. It is a second layer lot located off the 19 milestone Masjid Tanah/Lubok China Road. Notification for intended acquisition pursuant to s 8 of the Act was gazetted August 30, 1979 and therefore that is the date relevant for valuation purposes.

[2] The objection disclosed by the applicant in Form N is on the amount of compensation and the reason advanced on such objection is based on the compensation being lower than the market value of the acquired land at the relevant time.

[3] I do not think it is necessary for us to go into further discussions on the meaning of market value except to reproduce hereunder the oft cited passage of Jenkins CJ in the renowned case of Kailas Chandra v. Secretary of State 17 Cal LJ 35 as follows:

"The market value of any land may be roughly described as the price that an owner willing, and not obliged to sell might reasonably expect to ob

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top