SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 MarsdenLR 227

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
FOLIN & BROTHERS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
WONG FOH LING & ORS (NO 2) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Abdul Malik Ishak J:

To The Heart Of The Matter

This was an offshoot of a previous judgment vide Folin & Brothers Sdn Bhd v. Wong Foh Ling & Ors, [2001] 2 MLJ 23 which took off on the direction of the Honourable Chief Judge of Malaya and it was focussed entirely on encl 123 which was in the form of an appeal to the judge in chambers filed by the plaintiff on 6 July 2000 against the decision of the learned senior assistant registrar ("SAR") that was handed down on 6 July 2000. The learned SAR heard three enclosures simultaneously, namely, encls 107, 109 and 112 on 8 May 2000, 9 June 2000, 5 July 2000 and on 6 July 2000 she delivered her decision wherein she:-

(1) dismissed the plaintiff's application in encl 107 with costs;

(2) allowed Wong Boon Sun (the second defendant), Alice Wong Nee Chan Poh Suan (the third defendant), All Consult (M) Sdn Bhd (the fifth defendant), Folin Technologies (M) Sdn Bhd (the sixth defendant), Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co (didakwa sebagai sebuah firma) (the eighth defendant), KPMG Peat Marwick (didakwa sebagai sebuah firma) (the ninth defendant), Geh Cheng Hooi (the tenth defendant), and Ramli bin Ibrahim (the eleventh defendant) combined application

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top