SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 MarsdenLR 2723

HIGH COURT MUAR
JAMBRI ABD HAMID – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The appellant appealed against his conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Sessions Court Judge, Batu Pahat upon the following charge preferred against him:-

"Bahawa kamu pada 18hb Oktober 2004 jam lebih kurang 12.05 tengahari dihadapan Kaunter Syarikat Bas Express KKKL, Tingkat Bawah, Bangunan Menara Majlis Perbadanan Batu Pahat, No. 101 Jalan Rugayah, 83000, Batu Pahat, dalam Daerah Batu Pahat di dalam Negeri Johor Darul Takzim, sebagai pegawai badan awam, iaitu Sarjan RF 60153, Bahagian Narkotik Ibu Pejabat Polis Daerah Batu Pahat telah secara rasuah menerima bagi diri kamu suatu suapan iaitu wang tunai RM450.00 daripada Sharul Nizam bin Ahmad dan Mohd Shukor bin Md Jelani mendapatkan perintah diletakkan dibawah pengawasan pegawai polis mengikut Akta Penagih Dadah (Rawatan dan Pemulihan) 1983 dan dengan itu kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan dibawah seksyen 10(a) (bb) Akta Pencegahan Rasuah 1997 (Akta 575) yang boleh dihukum dibawah seksyen 15 Akta yang sama".

The facts in brief are as follows:-

On 26.9.2004, the complainant, SP-7, while riding his motorcycle with SP-8 as his pillion, was stopped by 3 policemen on suspicion of going against the traffic lights, of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top