SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 MarsdenLR 453

SUPREME COURT KUALA LUMPUR
PEMBANGUNAN MAHA MURNI SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
JURURUS LADANG SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Robert Lazar ,Respondent Advocate: JJ Puthucheary,LR Ratnam

JUDGMENT

Syed Agil Barakbah SCJ:

[1] In the Commercial Division of the High Court, Kuala Lumpur, the respondent/plaintiff claimed the sum of $960,000 from the appellant/defendant as the brokerage fee or commission of 3% of the total purchase price of real property known as Block 8 Keratong in the State of Pahang (Block 8) which the appellant purchased from the registered owner as a result of the alleged professional services of the respondent as broker. The trial Judge gave judgment for the respondent not for the full amount claimed but for the sum of $460,000 calculated at 2% of the total purchase price. The appellant being dissatisfied with the said decision, has now appealed. There is also a cross-appeal by the respondent for the inclusion of the award of interest at 8% per annum with effect from March 19, 1981 till the date of judgment which the learned Judge has omitted to award.

[2] Originally the appellant filed six grounds of appeal, but later abandoned the first three grounds leaving Grounds 4, 5 and 6 for argument.

[3] The relevant facts as accepted by the learned Judge were that sometime in 1976 Yayasan Islam, Melaka (Yayasan), wanted to purchase landed property. The Chairma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top