COURT OF APPEAL KUALA LUMPUR
SARASWATHY DEVI NADCHATIRAM – Appellant
Versus
VIJAYALAKSHMI DEVI NADCHATIRAM – Respondent
[1] The plaintiff Vijayalakshmi, who is the respondent in this appeal, has brought this action by originating summons against her sister Saraswathy. It is necessary to reproduce the heading of the originating summons as it is important to be aware of the matters referred to in the summons. It is follows:
[2] In this originating summons, Vijayalakshmi applies for an order enjoining Saraswathy (who is an advocate and solicitor) and her law firm from acting for:
(1) Jegadevan in Case Nos 24-346-1992 and 22-61-1993, 02-175-1994, 02- 260-1994 and 02-483-1995;
(2) Suseela Devi in Case Nos 22-95-1993 and 22-54-1995;
(3) Shanti d/o Thiruchelvasegaram in Case No S2-22-562-1993; and
(4) any of the brothers and sisters of the defendant in any proceedings relating to the estate of Nadchatiram and of Nadchatiram Realties (1960) Sdn Bhd (in liquidation) where Vijayalakshmi is a party to the proceedings.
[Emphasis Added]
[3] The judge below granted all the orders sought against Saraswathy thus preventing her and her firm from acting in all the matters referred to in the order. Hence this appeal.
[4] Of all the five cases referred to in the heading of the originating summons, it is onl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.