SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 MarsdenLR 5

COURT OF APPEAL KUALA LUMPUR
SARASWATHY DEVI NADCHATIRAM – Appellant
Versus
VIJAYALAKSHMI DEVI NADCHATIRAM – Respondent


JUDGMENT

NH Chan JCA:

[1] The plaintiff Vijayalakshmi, who is the respondent in this appeal, has brought this action by originating summons against her sister Saraswathy. It is necessary to reproduce the heading of the originating summons as it is important to be aware of the matters referred to in the summons. It is follows:

[2] In this originating summons, Vijayalakshmi applies for an order enjoining Saraswathy (who is an advocate and solicitor) and her law firm from acting for:

(1) Jegadevan in Case Nos 24-346-1992 and 22-61-1993, 02-175-1994, 02- 260-1994 and 02-483-1995;

(2) Suseela Devi in Case Nos 22-95-1993 and 22-54-1995;

(3) Shanti d/o Thiruchelvasegaram in Case No S2-22-562-1993; and

(4) any of the brothers and sisters of the defendant in any proceedings relating to the estate of Nadchatiram and of Nadchatiram Realties (1960) Sdn Bhd (in liquidation) where Vijayalakshmi is a party to the proceedings.

[Emphasis Added]

[3] The judge below granted all the orders sought against Saraswathy thus preventing her and her firm from acting in all the matters referred to in the order. Hence this appeal.

[4] Of all the five cases referred to in the heading of the originating summons, it is onl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top