SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 MarsdenLR 1478

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
INNAB SALIL & ORS – Appellant
Versus
VERVE SUITES MONT KIARA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION – Respondent
[Civil Appeal No: 02(i)-74-10-2019(W)]



Petitioner Advocates:Manpal Singh,Tan Weng Hung,Vinu Kamalanathan,Conrad Lopez ,Respondent Advocate: Shahabudin Shaik Alaudin,Rosnida Che Ibrahim,Siti Norazwani Zulkifli

Management corporations can enact rules to regulate property use, prioritizing community safety, and short-term rentals are classified as licenses, not tenancies under the applicable strata laws.

Headnote:(A) Strata Management Act 2013 – Section 70(5) – Strata Titles Act 1985 – The management corporation enacted House Rule No 3 to prohibit short-term rentals, upholding community safety and property management goals, rejecting claims that such actions violated owners' rights under the Act. (Paras 10, 17)

(B) The relationship between short-term renters and property owners has been determined as one of licensor-licensee rather than landlord-tenant, dismissing defendants' claims to exclusive possession as erroneous. (Paras 19, 86)

(C) Management rules enacted for community welfare are deemed valid even when they may restrict individual commercial interests, provided they align with statutory provisions. (Paras 31, 114)

Facts of the case: The appeal involves the enforcement of House Rule No 3 by the management corporation against defendants engaged in short-term rentals in residential units, citing violations of community rules aimed at preventing disruptions and ensuring property safety. (Paras 1-9)

Findings of Court: The appeals courts affirmed the legality of House Rule No 3 and compliance with the Strata Management Act, determining short-term rentals are licenses, not leases, thereby conforming to community management regulations and safety provisions. (Paras 17, 114)

Issues: The key questions were whether the management corporation could legally enact rules prohibiting short-term rentals and the characterization of short-term rental agreements as licenses or tenancies. (Paras 22-29)

Ratio Decidendi: The courts concluded that the rights of the community can restrict individual property use to uphold collective interests and safety, determining short-term rental transactions do not confer tenancy rights. (Paras 31, 114)

Result: Appeal dismissed with costs.

JUDGMENT

Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat CJ:

Introduction

[1] This appeal relates to the appellants'/defendants' use of their apartment units for commercial purposes by letting them out for short-term rental. The dispute arose when the respondent/plaintiff took issue with the appellants/ defendants using their respective premises for such purposes.

[2] The respondent/plaintiff is a management corporation incorporated under the Strata Titles Act 1985 ('the STA 1985') to maintain and manage a development known as "Verve Suits" ('Verve Suites') located at No 8, Jalan Kiara 5, Mont Kiara, 50480 Kuala Lumpur. Verve Suites was built on a plot of land held under GM 8661, Lot 67344, Mukim of Batu, District of Kuala Lumpur ('Land'). The category of land use is 'Building' with the express condition that the Land shall be used for commercial building with the purpose of service apartments and commercial only.

[3] The 1st appellant/1st defendant is a Swedish national and a tenant in Verve Suites. He owns 999,900 shares in the 2nd appellant/2nd defendant. The 3rd and the 4th appellants are the 8th and the 14th defendants respectively in the High Court. The other defendants are parcel owners in Verve Suites who leased out their units to the 2nd appellant/2nd defendant for short and long-term rentals. The other defendants either settled the suit at the High Court or chose not to appeal to this Court. The 1st and 2nd appellants/1st and 2nd defendants, in addition to leasing some units, managed the enterprise either for some or all of the other defendants as they originally were in the High Court.

[4] For ease of reference, in this judgment, parties will be referred to as they were in the High Court.

The Background Facts

[5] On 18 November 2015, the Commissioner of Building Kuala Lumpur ('COBKL') issued COBKL Circular 2015/2016 ('Circular'), instructing all joint management bodies or management corporations to curb the prevailing issue of the use of buildings in and around Kuala Lumpur for short-term rental.

[6] Following the Circular, the plaintiff held an Extraordinary General Meeting on 25 March 2017 proposing a resolution to enact 'House Rule No 3', which reads:

"3.0 OCCUPANCY

3.1 Approved use of the Units

The unit shall be used only for the purpose of service suites and shall not be used for business or any other purpose (Illegal or otherwise) which may be detrimental to the credibility of Verve Suites Mont Kiara.

The use of any unit for short-term rentals is prohibited. For the purpose of these rules, a short-term rentals agreement shall be deemed unless proven otherwise if they fall within the following:

i. Any stay for which a booking was made through services/applications/ websites etc such as AirBnb, booking.com, agoda.com, klsuites.com and other similar services;

ii. Any stay for which a signed and stamped tenancy agreement has not been filed with VSMO and tenants registered and issued with access cards;

iii. Any unit rented out with a tenancy agreement that permits the tenant from subleasing the property. Any breach of the above shall attract a penalty RM200 for each day the infringement continues. The Management reserves the rights to deactivate the access cards and barred [sic] the unit from facilities booking.

Any infringement found shall be deemed to be at minimum an overnight stay thus deemed as 2 days unless proven otherwise. A unit owner shall be liable for the penalties incurred by his tenant if his tenant carries such activities as prohibited under these rules and shall be deemed notified of such charges if an email or SMS has been sent to the address/number maintained in VSMO register. All fines collected under this section shall be used for the effort to combat the prohibited practice of short-term rentals."

[7] House Rule No 3 was passed with an overwhelming majority of 964 votes. The plaintiff asserted that the House Rule was passed for the purposes of regulating, controlling, managing and administering the use and enjoyment of Verve Suites'

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top