Back
COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
ZERIN PROPERTIES – Appellant
Versus
NAZA TTDI SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appeal was considered based on prior legal frameworks surrounding agency and contractual obligations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background facts surrounding the plaintiff's claim. (Para 3) |
| 3. the issues around appointment and effective cause were central to the appeal's arguments. (Para 4 , 5 , 30) |
| 4. the court emphasized the importance of evidencing parties' conduct in contractual relationships. (Para 6 , 44) |
| 5. core issues framed regarding appointment and compensation. (Para 7) |
| 6. court’s reasoning regarding agency and effective causation. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 7. despite multiple contracts, the appellant's entitlement was determined by their role in facilitating the joint venture. (Para 50) |
| 8. final verdict and conclusions drawn by the appellate court. (Para 53) |
[1] This is an appeal by the appellant/plaintiff against the decision of the learned High Court Judge ('the trial judge') made on 25 April 2018 dismissing its claim against the respondent/defendant with costs of RM35,000.00 subject to allocator fee.
[2] We shall for purposes of this appeal refer to the parties as they were referred to in the High Court. Having heard and considered the respective parties' submission
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
