SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 MarsdenLR 821

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
ZUNG ZANG WOOD PRODUCTS SDN BHD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
KWAN CHEE HANG SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Cyrus Das,Raymond Szetu,Tiong Jia Yi ,Respondent Advocate: Norbert Yapp

Table of Content
1. overview of parties involved in the disputes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. finding of facts regarding management and control. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. judicial findings on family business management and fraudulent acts. (Para 16)
4. discussion on the particulars of fraud allegations. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
5. allegations and particulars of fraud in pleadings. (Para 23)
6. application of limitation periods to claims. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
7. discussion on applicability of limitation laws concerning fraud. (Para 35 , 38)
8. review of evidence on corporate actions taken by mathew. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43)
9. evidence of financial mismanagement and breaches of fiduciary duty. (Para 44 , 46)

[1] These relatively complex Appeals arose from Sandakan High Court Civil Suits No S22-24 of 2008 (Suit No 24) and No S22-26 of 2008 (Suit No 26) which had been consolidated ("the Consolidated Suits") and heard jointly with Civil Suit No S22-39 of 2008 ("the Tekala Suit").

[2] These Suits revolve around the parents, their younger son and daughter in law, and family companies, with enormous acreages of plantation land in Sabah, and 1,550,000 sh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top