SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 MarsdenLR 4324 ; 2009 MarsdenLR 1

ABDUL MALIK ISHAK, AZHAR MAAH, SYED AHMAD HELMY
DATO SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM – Appellant
Versus
TUN DR MAHATHIR MOHAMAD – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Abdul Malik Ishak JCA:

Introduction

[1] There were two enclosures for our consideration. The first one was encl. 25a which was a notice of motion filed by the respondent (Tun Dr Mahathir bin Mohamad). The second was encl. 29a which was also a notice of motion filed by the appellant (Dato' Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim). We heard these two enclosures simultaneously.

[2] The notice of motion in encl. 25a sought to move this court for the following orders pursuant to art. 152 of the Federal Constitution and/or s. 8 of the National Language Acts 1963/1967 (Act 32) and/or s. 3 of the Interpretation Acts 1948 and 1967 (Act 388) and/or r. 101 of the Rules of the Court of Appeal 1994 and/or pursuant to the inherent jurisdiction of this court:

1. The appellant's record of appeal filed in the appellant's appeal herein be struck out and/or set aside.

2. Consequently, the appellant's appeal herein be dismissed with costs.

3. The costs of this application shall be borne by the appellant.

[3] While the notice of motion in encl. 29a sought for the following prayers:

1. That the applicant appellant be allowed to file this application out of time.

2. That the applicant appellant be allowed to fil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top