COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
AMTRUSTEE BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
THE STORE (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. matter concerns the validity of tenancy agreements. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
Introduction
[1] In the High Court, the plaintiff seeks for a declaration that the termination notice issued by the defendant is void and consequently, the Tenancy Agreements are valid.
[2] In response, the defendant brought a counterclaim for a declaration that the renewal of the Tenancy Agreements is subject to an increase in respect of the rate of 10% and that the termination by the defendant is valid.
[3] We shall be referring to parties in this judgment in their respective capacity in the High Court, the appellant as the defendant and the respondent as the plaintiff.
[4] The High Court had after a full trial, allowed the plaintiff's claim and dismissed the defendant's counterclaim.
[5] We heard the appeal. At the conclusion of the hearing of the appeal, by unanimous decision, we allowed it. The decision of the High Court is set aside.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.