SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 MarsdenLR 1019

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
PP – Appellant
Versus
LIM HOCK BOON – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Manoj Kurup ,Respondent Advocate: Gurbachan Singh Bagawan Singh

JUDGMENT

Zaki Tun Azmi CJ:

[1] I have the advantage of reading the two grounds of judgments of my learned brothers Abdul Aziz Mohamad FCJ and Nik Hashim FCJ. Both judgments dealt at length on the legal position of possession. And I do not need to go into them again.

[2] As regards the respondent's defence that the drug could have been put in the car by any one of the three persons named by him, I agree with the learned trial judge that for reasons given by him that the respondent has not raised any reasonable doubt in the prosecution's case.

[3] I therefore allow the appeal and set aside the orders of the Court of Appeal. The conviction and sentence of the High Court are restored.

Nik Hashim FCJ:

Background Facts

[4] The respondent was convicted and sentenced to death by the Kuala Lumpur High Court on 23 August 2004 for trafficking in dangerous drugs, ie, 892.4 grams of cannabis under s 39B of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (the Act). On appeal, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed. The prosecution now appeals to this Court against the decision of the Court of Appeal.

1

[5] The facts are that on 28 January 2000 at about 2am Chief Inspector W

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top