SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 MarsdenLR 2471

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
PP – Appellant
Versus
ZULKIFLI ARSHAD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Manoj Kurup ,Respondent Advocate: Hisyam Teh Poh Teik

Table of Content
1. conviction and sentencing for drug trafficking. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. detailed account of evidence related to the charges. (Para 6)
3. arguments regarding errors in prior court judgments. (Para 7 , 12)
4. analysis of evidence on drug possession and trafficking. (Para 8 , 10)
5. restoration of original conviction; affirmation of trial findings. (Para 19)
Hashim Yusoff FCJ:

[1] At the time when this judgment was drafted, YA Dato' Sri Augustine Paul, FCJ had passed away. However, YA Datuk Mohd Ghazali Mohd Yusoff, FCJ had seen this judgment in draft and expressed his concurrence with it. This would form the majority judgment of the Court.

At The High Court

[2] The respondent was charged with, convicted and sentenced to death by the Muar High Court on 23 April 2004 on two charges of trafficking in dangerous drugs contrary to s 39(B)(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 ("the Act").

[3] The first charge relates to trafficking in 5796.7 grammes of cannabis in a "Nike" bag found at the rear passenger seat of car registration No JCQ 2852 driven by the Respondent at about 1am on 27 January 2001, at Km 10 Jalan Kluang, Batu Pahat, Johore.

[4] The second charge relates to traffick

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top