Back
FEDERAL COURT KOTA KINABALU
PAN-PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION HOLDINGS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
NGIU-KEE CORPORATION (M) BHD & ANOR – Respondent
Key Points: - Point 1 (!) - Point 2 (!) - Point 3 (!) - Point 4 (!) - Point 5 (!) - Point 6 (!) - Point 7 (!) - Point 8 (!) - Point 9 (!) - Point 10 (!)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction and background of the case (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. issues presented for trial (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. core issues relating to s 181 of the act (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. judicial interpretation of 'oppression' within company law (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 5. expectations of good faith in quasi-partnerships (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 6. proof standards for claims of oppression (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 7. court analysis of findings from lower courts (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 8. evidentiary challenges and court's role (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 9. final observations on evidence regarding alleged breaches (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66) |
| 10. conclusion of appeal (Para 68 , 69) |
Introduction
[1] On 29 April 2008 leave was granted to the appellant to appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal reversing the decision of the High Court. Five questions were posed for consideration by this Court. Having heard the appeal proper judgment was reserved to consider the points involved.
[2] For convenience and to minimize confusion in this judgment the 1st responde
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
