COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
THE SUMMIT SUBANG USJ MANAGEMENT CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
HO PHOY KWANG & ANOR – Respondent
Introduction
[1] By encl 6, the Appellant vide a Notice of Application dated 12 July 2021, pursuant to O 28 r 4(3) and (4), O 28 r 8, O 38 r 2(2) and O 34 of the Rules of Court 2012 and/or the inherent jurisdiction of this Honourable Court sought the followings orders that:
1. The Originating Summons dated 30 April 2021 proceed to trial as a Writ action;
2. The Originating Summons and the Affidavits stand as pleadings subject to the deponents being made available for cross-examination;
3. The parties be permitted to call such other witnesses including the experts as may be necessary;
4. Enclosure 1 to be stayed pending the hearing and full and final disposal of this application;
5. Costs of and incidental to this application are to be borne by the Plaintiffs on solicitor - client indemnity;
6. Pursuant to O 34 of the Rules of Court 2012, such further or other directions and / or orders be made and / or given as this Honourable Court deems fit and just.
[2] Parties will be referred to as the Appellant and the Respondents respectively in this Judgment.
Brief Facts
[3] It is pertinent to recap the sequence of events and facts in order to appreciate the factual matrix of the pre
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.