THE SUMMIT SUBANG USJ MANAGEMENT CORPORATION vs HO PHOY KWANG & ANOR

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 1930

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
THE SUMMIT SUBANG USJ MANAGEMENT CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
HO PHOY KWANG & ANOR – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Harpal Singh Grewal,Harwinder Kaur,Dhanesh Subramaniam Nair ,Respondent Advocate: Raymond Mah Mun Kitt,Carolyn Ng

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. appellant's arguments for conversion. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16)
3. procedural developments in the case. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
4. court's reasoning on conversion application. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
5. final decision on the application. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)

Azmi Ariffin JCA:

Introduction

[1] By encl 6, the Appellant vide a Notice of Application dated 12 July 2021, pursuant to O 28 r 4(3) and (4), O 28 r 8, O 38 r 2(2) and O 34 of the Rules of Court 2012 and/or the inherent jurisdiction of this Honourable Court sought the followings orders that:

1. The Originating Summons dated 30 April 2021 proceed to trial as a Writ action;

2. The Originating Summons and the Affidavits stand as pleadings subject to the deponents being made available for cross-examination;

3. The parties be permitted to call such other witnesses including the experts as may be necessary;

4. Enclosure 1 to be stayed pending the hearing and full and final disposal of this application;

5. Costs of and incidental to this application are to be borne by the Plaintiffs on solicitor - client in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 1930

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYATHE SUMMIT SUBANG USJ MANAGEMENT CORPORATION – AppellantVersusHO PHOY KWANG & ANOR – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
THE SUMMIT SUBANG USJ MANAGEMENT CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
HO PHOY KWANG & ANOR – Respondent