SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 MarsdenLR 1445

COURT OF APPEAL KUALA LUMPUR
WEE CHOO KEONG – Appellant
Versus
LEE CHONG MENG & ANOR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Karpal Singh ,Respondent Advocate: Stanley Isaacs,Haliza Aini Othman

JUDGMENT

Siti Norma Yaakob JCA:

[1] To appreciate the nature of this appeal before us, it is necessary that we begin with some factual background.

[2] At the General Elections held on 25 April 1995, three contenders vied for the Parliamentary seat for the Bukit Bintang Constituency.

[3] The three were Mr. Wee Choo Keong, the appellant before us, Mr. Lee Chong Meng, the 1st respondent and Mr. Teng Chang Khim, who is not a party in this appeal.

[4] The appellant was duly elected the Member of Parliament for Bukit Bintang but his election was challenged by firstly the 1st respondent, who filed an election petition, PP-1-95 on 19 June 1995 and secondly by Mr. Wong Yook Sung @ Wong Tong Lim, the 2nd respondent and a voter at the same constituency, who filed a separate election petition, PP-3-95 on 2 August 1995.

[5] Both election petitions were filed pursuant to the provisions of Article 118 of the Federal Constitution> and both cited the Election Commission, the Returning Officer for the Bukit Bintang Constituency and the appellant, as respondents.

[6] The challenge in both petitions is grounded on the fact that the appellant had been convicted of the offence of contempt of Court and fined RM

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top