COURT OF APPEAL KUALA LUMPUR
WEE CHOO KEONG – Appellant
Versus
LEE CHONG MENG & ANOR – Respondent
[1] To appreciate the nature of this appeal before us, it is necessary that we begin with some factual background.
[2] At the General Elections held on 25 April 1995, three contenders vied for the Parliamentary seat for the Bukit Bintang Constituency.
[3] The three were Mr. Wee Choo Keong, the appellant before us, Mr. Lee Chong Meng, the 1st respondent and Mr. Teng Chang Khim, who is not a party in this appeal.
[4] The appellant was duly elected the Member of Parliament for Bukit Bintang but his election was challenged by firstly the 1st respondent, who filed an election petition, PP-1-95 on 19 June 1995 and secondly by Mr. Wong Yook Sung @ Wong Tong Lim, the 2nd respondent and a voter at the same constituency, who filed a separate election petition, PP-3-95 on 2 August 1995.
[5] Both election petitions were filed pursuant to the provisions of Article 118 of the Federal Constitution> and both cited the Election Commission, the Returning Officer for the Bukit Bintang Constituency and the appellant, as respondents.
[6] The challenge in both petitions is grounded on the fact that the appellant had been convicted of the offence of contempt of Court and fined RM
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.