SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 2824

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
BALAMONEY ASORIAH – Appellant
Versus
MMIP SERVICES SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Ramesh Namasivayam ,Respondent Advocate: Shanmugam Ramasamy,Sharmini Thiruchelvam

[1] On 28 November 2018, the High Court granted the respondent's application made pursuant to s 96(3) of the Road Transport Act 1987 , for inter alia a declaration that Insurance Policy No: 213-08116-004654 [said Policy] is void and unenforceable. The respondent was further granted several other declaratory reliefs exonerating it from liability for the accident on 28 October 2016 involving Motor-Van No: BEM 6573 and Motorcycle No: BKB 6097. The appellant was one of the persons involved in that accident.

[2] Upon appeal, we unanimously allowed the appeal and set aside the decision of the High Court.

Salient Facts

[3] These are the details of the accident and the insurance policy in issue. On 28 October 2016, Jayandran a/l Mathan [Jayandran], a minor, was riding pillion on Motorcycle No: BKB 6097. That motorcycle was involved in a collision with Motor-Van: BEM 6573 driven by the 1st defendant and owned by one Selvamani a/l Athimoolam (deceased) [Selvamani]. Jayandran was injured in that accident.

[4] His mother, Balamoney a/p Asoriah decided to sue on his behalf. As required under s 96(3) of the Road Transport Act 1987 [Act 333], she served a Notice on the insurer prior to the filing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top