FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
PP – Appellant
Versus
DENISH MADHAVAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of charges and court decisions (Para 1) |
| 2. accused’s complaints regarding reliance on confession (Para 2) |
| 3. court's reasoning on the admission of statements (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. prosecution's obligation in indicating evidence provisions (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. standards for reviewing past decisions (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. finding of no injustice warranting review (Para 14) |
| 7. final dismissal of application (Para 15) |
[1] The applicant (in this judgment will be referred to as the accused) was charged for trafficking of drug under s 39B(2)[1] of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 ('DDA') which carries the death penalty. He was found guilty by the High Court. The conviction and sentence were later set aside and substituted with a conviction for the offence of possession of drugs and the accused was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment and ten lashes of the rotan under s 39A(2)[2] by the Court of Appeal. Afterwards, the Public Prosecutor appealed to the Federal Court. The Federal Court reversed the decision of the Court of Appeal and reinstated the decision of the High Court.
[2] In seeking for his conviction to be reviewed pursuant to powers under r 137[3] of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.