SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 MarsdenLR 313

HIGH COURT, SINGAPORE
DYNACAST (S) PTE. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
LIM MENG SIANG & ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Chao Hick Tin JC (Sup. Ct):

The plaintiffs are manufactures of small precision metal and plastic components. They are a wholly owned subsidiary of a multinational corporation with headquarters in the United Kingdom. The defendants were formerly the employees of the plaintiffs, having at different times resigned from the employment of the plaintiffs.

The aim of the present action is essentially to restrain the defendants from making use of the plaintiffs' confidential/proprietary information and/or property without the plaintiffs' consent and to require the defendants to return to the plaintiffs all books, equipments software and other property of the plaintiffs which are in the defendants' possession.

By an ex-parte application made to the Judge in chambers, the plaintiffs were, on 16 June 1989, granted an Anton Piller order permitting the plaintiffs by their representatives to enter the defendants' premises to search for and remove certain specified documents and articles of the plaintiffs. The Anton Piller order was executed on the same day and the plaintiffs recovered a number of articles and documents pursuant thereto. The thing recovered were duly recorded and acknowledge

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top