COURT OF APPEAL KUALA LUMPUR
NG HEE THOONG & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC BANK BERHAD – Respondent
[1] We allowed this appeal on 16 January 1995, for the reasons that follow.
[2] The appellants are guarantors of a loan advanced by the respondent to one Foo Yik Sdn Bhd (the first defendant in the Court below, and now in liquidation) under two overdraft facilities, the first for RM30,000 bearing interest at the rate of 11% per annum from 1 October 1989, and the second for RM1,150,000 bearing interest at the rate of 11.5% per annum from the same date. The interest is at monthly rests. The guarantee in respect of the first loan is dated 7 January 1981 while that in respect of the second is dated 2 August 1984. Both guarantees give the addresses of the appellants as 83, Jalan Sultan Iskandar, Ipoh. The liability of the appellants under both guarantees is predicated upon the making of a demand upon them by the respondent. Clause 8 in both guarantees reads as follows:
As to each of us any notice may be served on each of us or on the legal personal representative of each of us either personally or by sending the same through the post in an envelope addressed to the above mentioned address or the last known place of address of the person to be served, and a notic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.