COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
ROSSARIN NUEKAEW – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant charged under drug laws. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prosecution established possession and knowledge. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. defence strategy failed credibility standards. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's evaluation of evidence led to conviction. (Para 10 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. procedural matters did not undermine conviction. (Para 11 , 12) |
Introduction
[1] The appellant is a Thai national. She was charged in the High Court at Alor Setar for trafficking in dangerous drugs. The charge was as follows:
"Bahawa kamu pada 9hb Disember 2011 jam lebih kurang 8.15 malam, di bahagian lorong Terminal Bas Shahab Perdana, di dalam daerah Kota Setar, dalam Negeri Kedah Darul Aman telah didapati mengedar dadah berbahaya iaitu cannabis sejumlah berat 16841 gram. Oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan di bawah s 39B(1)(a) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 39B(2) Akta yang sama."
[2] The appellant was found guilty after a trial and sentenced to death on 29 October 2014 by the High Court. An appeal to the Court of Appeal was filed on the same day. The appeal came up for hearing on the 8 December 2015 at the Court of Appeal. Afte
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.