SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 MarsdenLR 2516

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SISTEM LINGKARAN LEBUHRAYA KAJANG SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
INCH KENNETH KAJANG RUBBER LTD & ANOR & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. intervention in land reference cases (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. application of laa 1960 provisions (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. conditions for compensation claims under laa 1960 (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. improper application of intervention rules (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
KN Segara JCA:

[1] All three appeals were heard together before us, as the issue in all the three appeals centered on the application by the appellant made by three identical summons in chambers to intervene and be made a co-respondent in the respective three Land Reference cases at the High Court, Shah Alam.

[2] The proposed intervener in the three Land Reference cases is Sistem Lingkaran Lebuhraya Kajang Sdn Bhd ("SILK"). It is the concessionaire appointed by the Government of Malaysia to undertake the construction of Lebuhraya Penyuaraian Trafik Jalan Lingkaran Kajang ("SILK Highway") pursuant to a Privatisation Agreement dated 8 October 1997 and Supplementary Privatisation Agreement dated 1 August 2001.

[3]Vide Selangor State Government Gazette No 1862 dated 24 October 2002 the "scheduled lands" were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act 1960 ('LAA 1960') for the SILK Highway. Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia (LL

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top