Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
SAMUEL NAIK SIANG TING – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC BANK BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background related to property transactions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. legal questions for determination regarding ownership. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. findings of the high court and court of appeal. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 4. appellant's argument regarding title acquisition. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. respondent's counterarguments against the appellant's claims. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. rulings on new issues raised and the significance of pleadings. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. importance of following established legal principles in the appeal. (Para 32 , 33 , 36) |
| 8. indefeasibility of title under the national land code. (Para 55 , 57 , 58 , 60 , 61) |
| 9. interplay of good faith and indefeasibility principles. (Para 80 , 82 , 85) |
| 10. final conclusion and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 87) |
[1] This is an appeal against the concurrent findings of the High Court and the Court of Appeal allowing the respondent's claim against the appellant vide encl 62, pursuant to O 14A of the Rules of the High 1980 (RHC). The appellant before us is one Samuel Naik Siang Ting who was the 1st defendant at the High Court while the respondent is Public Bank B
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
