SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 MarsdenLR 1363

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
JETARA SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MAJU HOLDINGS SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Oon Chee Kheng,Doris Chong ,Respondent Advocate: Ahmad Hafez Zaidi

JUDGMENT

Hasan Lah JCA:

Introduction

[1] the appellant applied by way of summons-in-chambers dated 30 July 2004 for summary Judgment pursuant to O 14 of the Rules of the High 1980. The appellant's application was allowed by the learned senior assistant registrar who gave Judgment for the appellant for:-

(a) the sum of RM3,017,587.15;

(b) interest at the rate of 8% per annum on the sum of RM3,017,587.15 from the date of the order till the date of full realization; and

(c) costs.

[2] Being dissatisfied with that decision the respondent appealed against the decision to the judge in chambers. The learned Judge who heard the appeal allowed the respondent's appeal. The appellant then appealed against the decision of the learned Judge. On 10 October 2006 we heard this appeal and by a unanimous decision we allowed the appeal with costs.

Facts Of The Case

[3] the respondent was the main contractor of a project known as "Cadangan Membina Kolej Matrikulasi Perak Di Atas Sebahagian Dari Lot 137664, Mukim Teja, Daerah Kinta Untuk Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia" (hereinafter referred to as "the said project"). The appellant was appointed by the respondent as a sub-contractor for RC Work, Brickwork, Pl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top