FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
CIMB BANK BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
MAYBANK TRUSTEES BERHAD & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of multiple civil appeals. (Para 1 , 1 , 2) |
| 2. background facts regarding the bonds issuance. (Para 3 , 11) |
| 3. facts related to the financing of pesaka through bonds. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 15 , 20) |
| 4. arguments surrounding the need for compliance with conditions precedent. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 61 , 90) |
| 5. court observations on bondholder rights. (Para 19 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. court of appeal observations regarding claims. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 7. court's conclusion on compliance with account conditions. (Para 65 , 66 , 86) |
| 8. conclusion regarding liability and indemnity. (Para 80 , 89 , 92) |
| 9. court conclusion on liability for full bond amount. (Para 91) |
| 10. pre-judgment interest and its application. (Para 99 , 101) |
| 11. mtb's claim for indemnity against pesaka. (Para 103 , 121) |
| 12. final orders and conclusions of the court. (Para 158) |
[1] There are five appeals before this court and they are:
(i) Civil Appeal No: 02(f)-27-04-2012(W) with CIMB Bank Berhad as the appellant and Maybank Trustees Berhad as the respondent;
(ii) Civil Appeal No: 02(f)-28-04-2012(W) with Datin Murnina bt Dato Haji Sujak as the appellant and Maybank Trustees Berhad as the resp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.