SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 1380

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
BANK ISLAM MALAYSIA BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
AQUASIX CORPORATION SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent


[1] This is an appeal by the defendant against the decision of the learned High Court Judge at Tawau High Court made on 23 December 2011 whereby the plaintiffs' claim against the defendant was allowed on the ground that the defendant was liable for breach of contract for its failure to disburse the financing facilities earlier granted by the defendant to the 1st plaintiff.

Brief Facts

[2] The facts of the case are as follows:

(a) On or about 6 November 2003, the 1st plaintiff applied to the defendant at its Tawau branch for loan facilities up the sum of RM1,500,000.00 for the purpose of taking over and operating a then existing prawn farm owned and operated by Panduan Era Sdn Bhd (2nd plaintiff) at Jurangan, Tawau;

(b) In support of its application for the loan facilities, the 1st plaintiff submitted to the defendant a set of supporting documents and having evaluated the documents, the defendant had on 8 March 2004 by two separate Letters of Offer to the 1st plaintiff granted the following Islamic Banking loan facilities, namely:

(1) a revolving Murabahah working capital financing to the limit of RM700,000.00; and

(2) a cash note facility in the sum of RM750,000.00;

(c) The capital financ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top