SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 619

COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA
PUNCAK ALAM HOUSING SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MENTA CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeal against high court decision and basis of claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. factual background regarding the parties involved. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. details of contractual agreements and payments. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)

[1] This was an appeal against the decision of the High Court in dismissing the appellant's claim and entering judgment on the 1st respondent's counterclaim after a full trial.

[2] The appellant's claim before the High Court was for the rescission of a settlement agreement on the grounds of conspiracy, fraud and for breach of contract.

[3] The 1st respondent's counterclaim centred on the settlement agreement where the appellant agreed to pay the 1st respondent the sum of RM11,498,788.12. After the appellant had made the first payment of RM2,500,000.00, the appellant defaulted in making the subsequent instalment and pursuant to the settlement agreement, the appellant was liable to pay the 1st respondent the remaining balance sum of RM8,998,788.12.

The Relevant Facts

[4] This is a factually based appeal and we will now narrate the events that follow. The appellant is the developer of a housing project in Bukit Cerakah, Shah Alam. The 1st r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top