INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
INTER PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT SDN. BHD. – Appellant
Versus
MAT JUHARI BIN HUSSEIN – Respondent
The claimant was employed by the company as a junior town planner on 1 August 1990. Vide para. 5 of his letter of appointment (Exhibit CLCI) he was placed on probation for 6 months. The claimant's probationary period would have expired on 31 January 1991.
By a letter dated 1 February 1991 (Exhibit CO3) which was received by the claimant on 30 March 1991 the claimant was informed that his probationary period had been extended by a period of 3 months commencing 1 February 1991. By another letter dated 1 May 1991 (Exhibit CL2) which was received by the claimant on 15 May 1991, the claimant was again informed that his probationary period was extended by a further period of 3 months commencing 1 May 1991.
By a letter dated 31 July 1991 (Exhibit CO6) the claimant was informed that the company was not confirming him in his appointment. Pursuant to cl. 5 of the letter of appointment, the company terminated the claimant's employment by giving him 2 weeks salary in lieu of notice. The claimant was further informed that he shall cease to be an employee of the company with effect from 1 August 1991.
The claimant contends that the termination of his employment was without just cause or excuse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.