COURT OF APPEAL KUALA LUMPUR
AIRSPACE MANAGEMENT SERVICES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
COL (B) HARBANS SINGH CHINGAR SINGH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appeal addresses whether the high court exceeded its review powers. (Para 1) |
| 2. the original case's context and the implications of judicial review are illustrated. (Para 2 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. details of revised compensation determine fairness in judicial outcomes. (Para 39 , 40) |
[1] This appeal raises no question of any importance. It concerns an issue that has been dealt with on numerous occasions by this court and by the Federal court. It is whether the High court exercised appellate powers in an application for certiorari and thereby exceeded its judicial review function. The facts relevant to the appeal may be shortly stated.
[2] The respondent was at all material times employed by the appellant as deputy project manager The terms of the respondent's employment became a matter of serious dispute in the proceedings before the Industrial court. It is necessary to outline the stand that each side took on the point.
[3] According to the appellant, the respondent was employed pursuant to an agreement contained in a letter of appointment dated 13 July 1994. This document states that the respondent's employment was for an initial probationary period of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.