SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 298

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SUMMER HARVEST SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MICHAEL CHANG TZE CHON & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Malik Imtiaz,S Raven,Surendra Anand,Siti Nur Amirah Aqilah Adzman ,Respondent Advocate: Manian Raju,Pung Jenn Jiang,Elizabeth Low

Table of Content
1. the definitions of obligations under the joint venture agreement. (Para 1)

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the learned High Court Judge given on 22 October 2015 in allowing the respondents claim against the appellant. The matter concerns a joint venture agreement (the JVA) between the appellant and the respondents dated 7 November 1995, by which the appellant was to develop the respondents land held under Grant 2960 Lot No 363, Mukim of Seremban, Negeri Sembilan measuring 80.56 acres (the said land), into a housing estate named Taman Coral Heights (the development). The development was to consist of four separate phases and, as consideration, the respondents were to be given an agreed number of low cost and medium cost houses.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top