SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 664

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
ROSSARIN NUEKAEW – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appellant was charged with drug trafficking. (Para 1 , 2)
2. trial court affirmed the conviction. (Para 3 , 4)

[1] The appellant, was charged before the High Court at Alor Setar in the State of Kedah with an offence under s 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 ("the Act") for trafficking in 16841 grams of cannabis ("the said drugs"), an offence punishable under subsection 39B(2) of the same Act. The appellant was tried and convicted by the High Court on the charge and sentenced to death. The appellant's appeal to the Court of Appeal was heard and dismissed. The appellant now appeals to this Court against the decision of the Court of Appeal in dismissing her appeal.

[2] The relevant facts of the prosecution's case are as follows:

"On 9 December 2011, about 7.00 pm, Inspector Samsualan bin Samsudin (SP2) received information of drug trafficking by a foreign national in the vicinity of the Shabab Perdana Bus Terminal in Alor Setar. Based on the said information, SP2 led a raiding party to the said Bus Terminal. Whilst carrying out observation at the Bus Terminal, about 8.00pm, SP2 noticed the appellant walking along lane 6 of the said Bus Terminal. She was carryi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top