SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 1588

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
EMAS KIARA SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MICHAEL JOSEPH MONTEIRO & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. nature of the claim regarding contract enforcement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 10)
2. issues related to conspiracy and abuse of process. (Para 19 , 34 , 43 , 68)
3. determining agency of receivers and duty of care. (Para 22 , 41 , 75)
4. final conclusion on dismissal. (Para 74 , 77)
Azizul Azmi Adnan JC:

Introduction

[1] This is a written judgment delivered in an application by the defendants to strike out the claim of the plaintiff.

[2] In order to contextualise the nature of the claim, it will be necessary to recite the brief facts of this case. The background facts, in so far as they are material to this application are set out below, which I have adapted from the submissions of counsel to whom I am grateful.

Background

[3] The plaintiff claims that there exists a concluded contract for the purchase of land and properties in Lembah Beringin entered into between the plaintiff on one hand as purchaser, and the 1st , 2nd and 3rd defendants on the other. The 1st and 2nd defendants are receivers and managers of the 3rd defendant, Lembah Beringin Sdn Bhd (referred to in this judgment as the company), who were appointed by the 12th defendant, RHB Bank Berhad (RHB) as a debenture hol

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top