SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 3013

COURT OF APPEAL KOTA KINABALU
LIKAS BAY PRECINCT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
BINA PURI SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Lim Pitt Kong ,Respondent Advocate: Michael Chow

Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim JCA:

Brief Facts Of The Case

[1] Bina Puri Sdn Bhd ("the petitioner") obtained an Adjudication Award dated 31 December 2016 ("Adjudication Award") against Likas Bay Precinct Sdn Bhd ("the respondent") in the matter of an adjudication conducted pursuant to the Kuala Lumpur Regional Centre for Arbitration Rules ("KLRCA Rules") and Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 ("CIPAA 2012") for the certified sums amounting to RM16,439,628.24.

[2] The petitioner served a Statutory Notice of Demand dated 31 January 2017 ("the Statutory Notice") pursuant to s 465 of the Companies Act 2016 (" CA 2016") together with its letter dated 31 January 2017 on the respondent at its registered office in Kota Kinabalu.

[3] The petitioner further stated that as at the date of the Petition, the respondent has neglected and/or failed to pay or satisfy the Adjudicated Sum or any part thereof or to secure or compound for it to the reasonable satisfaction of the petitioner.

[4] Consequently, the petitioner presented this Petition dated 17 March 2017 to wind up the respondent pursuant to s 465(1)(e) and (h) of the Companies Act 2016 , ie, on the ground that the res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top