SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 MarsdenLR 1143

HIGH COURT MALAYA TEMERLOH
KIAN LUP CONSTRUCTION – Appellant
Versus
HONGKONG BANK MALAYSIA BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Mohd Nadzim Ibrahim,Rosal Azimin Ahmad ,Respondent Advocate: AS Vengadeswaran,Linda Kam

JUDGMENT

Ramly Ali J:

[1] The plaintiff, Kian Lup Construction, a business entity registered under the Business Registration Act 1956, filed the present suit against the defendant, Hongkong Bank Malaysia Berhad, for libel and slander and claiming damages not less than RM3,000,000 and/or for an amount to be assessed by the court and/or in the alternative, general as well as punitive damages for breach of fiduciary duty. The plaintiff had prior to the present suit, filed a writ summons vide Civil Suit No: 22-14-1996 which was struck out on preliminary issue and thereon filed a fresh suit ie, the present suit which is before the court now.

Facts Of The Case

[2] The plaintiff, Kian Lup Construction is a business entity duly registered under the Business Registration Act 1956 and was set up in Gua Musang, Kelantan from 1995 to 1999. One Chong Won Chee (PW1) claimed to be the sole proprietor of the plaintiff. PW1 was born in Kelantan and started his construction business in Kelantan under the name of the plaintiff. PW1 has also four other companies registered in Kelantan which do not deal with construction business. PW1 come to Raub sometimes in 1995 to do construction work on Hotel Sri Raub

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top