AHMAD JEFRI MOHD JAHRI vs PENGARAH KEBUDAYAAN & KESENIAN JOHOR & ORS

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2010 MarsdenLR 142

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
AHMAD JEFRI MOHD JAHRI – Appellant
Versus
PENGARAH KEBUDAYAAN & KESENIAN JOHOR & ORS – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Karpal Singh Ram Singh,Ramkarpal Singh Karpal Singh,Subramaniam Nair,Ebrina Zubir ,Respondent Advocate: Hjh Azizah Hj Nawawi

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case and reliefs sought. (Para 2 , 4)
2. arguments regarding appropriate procedures in judicial review. (Para 3 , 5)
3. legal framework for judicial review in malaysia. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. purpose of strict conditions under o 53 rhc. (Para 10 , 16 , 18)
5. public policy regarding judicial review and abuse of court process. (Para 15 , 19 , 20)
6. conditions for decisions by public authorities to be amenable for judicial review. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 27)
7. judicial review available for public servants under specific circumstances. (Para 30)
8. requirement for public law element in claims. (Para 34 , 35 , 37)
9. clarification on appropriate procedures for claims against public authorities. (Para 50 , 51 , 60)
10. final determination on the appropriateness of the proceedings. (Para 63 , 64)

James Foong FCJ:

Introduction

[1] This appeal concerns the appropriate procedure for use in judicial review.

[2] The facts of this case are as follows: The appellant was a Government officer attached to the Ministry of Culture, Arts and Tourism since 16 September 1993. He had a dispute with his superior and refused to turn up for work since 28

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2010 MarsdenLR 142

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYAAHMAD JEFRI MOHD JAHRI – AppellantVersusPENGARAH KEBUDAYAAN & KESENIAN JOHOR & ORS – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
AHMAD JEFRI MOHD JAHRI – Appellant
Versus
PENGARAH KEBUDAYAAN & KESENIAN JOHOR & ORS – Respondent