SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 MarsdenLR 472

COURT OF APPEAL KUALA LUMPUR
SIOW YOON KEONG – Appellant
Versus
H ROSEN ENGINEERING BV – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Siow Yoon Keong ,Respondent Advocate: WM Chang

JUDGMENT

Abdul Hamid Mohamad JCA:

[1] By a writ action No D3-22-1033-91 H Rosen Engineering BV ("Rosen") sued Ventura Industries Sdn Bhd ("Ventura") claiming for payment of a sum of RM423,000, interest and costs. That amount was for the balance that Ventura should pay Rosen under an Agency Agreement dated 1 August 1989 between them. On 28 May 1992 Rosen obtained a summary judgment against Ventura under O 14 of the Rules of the High 1980 ("RHC 1980").

[2] On 28 December 1995 Rosen took out an Originating Summons No D2-24-432-95 against Siow Yoon Keong, the appellant in this appeal. Rosen sought, in brief:

(a) A declaration that the business of Ventura had been carried out with intent to defraud the creditors of Ventura, especially Rosen or for a fraudulent purpose;

(b) A declaration that the appellant was knowingly a party to the carrying on of the business of Ventura in that manner and shall be personally responsible, without any limitation of liability, for the debt or other liabilities of Ventura to Rosen.

(c) An order that the appellant pays to Rosen the balance sum of RM423,000 together with interest for which a judgment had been obtained by Rosen against Ventura.

[3] On 11 April 199

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top