SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Salleh Abas FJ (delivering the judgment of the Court):

In this appeal certain transactions took place in Singapore between the respondents, a London confirming house, and a Singapore company known as Southern Equipment Suppliers (S) Pte. Ltd., relating to the financing of purchases of goods by the latter. The appellants who are the directors of Southern Equipment Suppliers (S) Pte. Ltd. and live in Johore Bharu, gave a guarantee to the respondents with respect to those transactions. The question to be determined in this appeal is whether by entering into those transactions the respondents are a moneylender within the meaning of our Moneylenders'

Ordinance No. 42 of 1951, so that the guarantee which the respondents sought to enforce against the appellants is unenforceable, as to do so would be to undermine our Moneylenders' Ordinance, 1951.

It is a general principle of law that any transaction taking place outside the jurisdiction can only be enforced in the local Courts if they are not contrary to the local law and regulations. Under the continental system the priority of lex lociover lex fori is based on the doctrine of odre public or jus cogens under which any domestic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top