SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img



JUDGMENTBY: LEE HUN HOE CJ (BORNEO)

(delivering the judgment of the court): We allowed the appeal with costs here and the court below. We stated we would give our reasons later. We do so now.

On 11 June 1982 the plaintiffs and the defendants entered into an agreement whereby the plaintiffs agreed to build for the defendants 26 units of double-storey terrace houses and 29 units of single-storey terrace houses in Lot No 3405 at Mukim of Assam Kumbong, Perak for $ 1,762,000. The plaintiffs erected and completed all the houses. The plaintiffs alleged as follows. On 3 July 1985 the parties agreed that the defendants would pay the plaintiffs interest on the balance still remaining unpaid from 1 November 1983 at 1.5% per month until payment in full of the balance. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants owed $ 135,964.22 being balance of contract price and interest. In part payment of the above sum the defendants gave the plaintiffs three cheques totalling $ 25,000. These cheques when presented were dishonoured. The plaintiffs sued the defendants. The summons were said to be served on the defendants on 8 November 1985. No appearance having been entered by the defendants the plain

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top