SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Zakaria Yatim J:

In this petition the petitioner, Kimoyama Elektrik (M) Sdn. Bhd. is seeking the order of the Court to wind-up the respondent company, Metrobilt Construction Sdn. Bhd. (hereinafter referred to as `the company') on the ground that the company is unable to pay its debts.

There are other creditors of the company who attended the hearing of the petition. Three of the creditors, viz., Miliweb (M) Sdn. Bhd., Arab-Malaysian Merchant Bank Berhad and Syarikat Pembinaan Low Eng Moh Sdn. Bhd. are opposing the petition. One other creditor, Fullmark (M) Sdn. Bhd., (Fullmark) was also present at the hearing. Fullmark has given notice of its intention to support the petition.

At the commencement of the hearing of the petition, Mr. C.K. Tan, Counsel for Fullmark told the Court that Fullmark was withdrawing itself as a supporting creditor in the petition. Mr. Gurubachan Singh, Counsel for the petitioner objected to Fullmark withdrawing itself from supporting the petition. He said that a sum of RM50,000 had been paid by the company to Fullmark in settlement of the debt. He added that the company had also transferred a piece of property to Fullmark in addition to the amount p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top