SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Haji Mohd Jemuri Serjan CJ (Borneo):

The appellant was formerly, before his dismissal, a Police Inspector in the Royal Malaysian Police stationed, at the material time, at Pulau Tikus, IPD Georgetown, Pulau Pinang. On 10 March 1990 he received a letter to show cause from Penolong Ketua Urusetia KPN (Tatatertib), on behalf of the Inspector- General of Police (the respondent), to the effect that the Inspector-General of Police, acting pursuant to the powers delegated to him by the Police Force Commission, had decided to take disciplinary action against the appellant under G.O. 26 of the Public Officers (Conduct and Discipline) (Cap. "D") General Orders 1980. It was represented to the Inspector-General of Police that the appellant was guilty of unsatisfactory work or misconduct which in his opinion merited dismissal. Under the circumstances, the Inspector-General of Police proposed to dismiss the appellant on the grounds contained in the following eight charges:

1.1. Pertuduhan Pertama

Bahawa anda, seorang Pegawai Awam, iaitu Inspektor, dalam Pasukan Polis DiRaja Malaysia, semasa bertugas sebagai Inspektor Kawasan Pulau Tikus, IPD Georgetown, Pulau Pinang, telah didapati tid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top