SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Peh Swee Chin FCJ:

This appeal involves a fatal accident to a pedestrian together with a motor cyclist; the latter did not give evidence in the trial court, who according to his counsel, was abroad at that time while there was no other living eyewitness to the accident apart from the motor cyclist. The somewhat unusual situation has given rise also to certain controversial questions which have to be decided.

The plaintiffs are the administrators of the deceased pedestrian while the first defendant was the motorcyclist and the second defendant, the registered owner of the motorcyle driven by the first defendant. The result in the Sessions Court, the trial court, was that the claims of the plaintiffs were dismissed with costs but the Sessions Court further correctly proceeded to assess damages on the assumed basis of total liability as follows in the event of an appeal:

(a) Agreed special damages RM1,500

(b) Damages for lost years RM10,635

(c) Damages for loss of expectation of life RM6,000

(d) Damages for loss of services to the children of the deceased RM5,117

(e) Damages for loss of consortium to the husband RM1,500

(f) Interest in the usual terms and costs Unspeci

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top