SUPPLEMENTARY JUDGMENT

On 11 December, 1997 I delivered a written judgment in favour of the Plaintiffs in respect of prayers 1, 2, 4 and 10 of their claims. There was no order in respect of prayer 3 as it would be academic as the prospectus had been carried into effect. Prayer 5 is in the alternative to prayer 1(b) and I made no order.

As prayers 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the re-amended statement of claim and paragraph 25A of the re-amended statement of [2] defence, that is, set-off, were not addressed by the counsels pending the determination of the Court on the main prayers, I then invited both counsels to address on those prayers. It was then agreed by both counsels for them to do so on 19 December, 1997. In the meantime, Miss Ambiga, counsel for the Defendant, applied for an interim order of stay pending the filing of a formal application by the Defendant for an order of stay pending appeal against my judgment. Dato Kandan, counsel for the Plaintiffs, acting on the instructions of his clients objected for the interim order of stay. However, I allowed it and ordered the formal application for an order of stay be heard also on 19 December, 1997.

Prayers 6 and 7

Dato Kandan, intimated that