SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Gopal Sri Ram JCA:

Introduction

Thirteen appeals came before us when we commenced hearing on Tuesday, 16 June 1998. Of these, three have been withdrawn. Ten now remain upon which we are required to pronounce our decision and give our reasons.

All ten appeals have two things in common. First, they arise out of the same civil suit; second, almost all of them involve a review of discretion exercised by the judge in the court below. Some of these appeals have common subject matter and were, therefore, heard together. The particulars of the appeals are as follows: 1. Civil Appeal Nos. W-03-27-98, W-02-301-98 and W-03-313-98, all of which are directed against the learned judge's order refusing applications requiring the respondents before us to furnish security for costs.

2. Civil Appeal No. W-02-459-97 which is an appeal against the order of the learned judge refusing to strike out the quantification of damages appearing at the foot of the writ and statement of claim.

3. Civil Appeals Nos. W-03-4-98 and W-03-5-98 which are directed against the learned judge's refusal to order the plaintiffs to furnish particulars of their pleadings.

4. Civil Appeals Nos: W-03-40-97 and W-03

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top