SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

KN Segara J:

The plaintiff's cause of action in defamation arises from certain statements appearing in a police report made on 1 September 1993 by the defendant. The defendant is a director and shareholder of Sey Hoe Sdn. Bhd. The collective equity ownership of the defendant, together with his brothers and Alor Janggus Soon Seng Sdn. Bhd., in Sey Hoe Sdn. Bhd. is 43.75% (according to the report).

The 1st plaintiff is an advocate & solicitor practising under the name of Hoe & Ahmad Zaki, in partnership with the 2nd plaintiff.

The 1st plaintiff is furious over the police report because the defendant has made groundless allegations that the 1st plaintiff has parted with 682,500 original share certificates in MGR Corporation, belonging to Sey Hoe Sdn. Bhd., to Lim Chin Teik, the managing director of Sey Hoe Sdn. Bhd.

Lim Chin Teik is a friend of the 1st plaintiff. The 1st plaintiff was acting as the solicitor for the vendor, Sey Hoe Sdn. Bhd., and prepared the sale and purchase agreement of the shares set out in the agreement dated 1 September 1992 (p. 1, Bundle B) and the supplemental agreement dated 1 November 1992 (p. 5, Bundle B). The 1st plaintiff only took instruction

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top