JUDGMENT

Mohd Saari Yusoff JCA:

Factual Background

At all material times the appellant ("ASP Ang") was Assistant Superintendent of Police. In his evidence, SD1, the secretary of first respondent ("PSC") deposed that upon receiving a report from secretariat IGP cawangan tatatertib, caused summary of facts, report and statement of witnesses to be circulated to members of the first respondent for the purpose of determining whether there was a prima faciecase against the appellant. Subsequently, a show-cause letter dated 30 June 1993 (p. 76 of AR) was sent to ASP Ang, in which it contained four charges. In response to the letter, ASP Ang made a representation to PSC videhis letter dated 23 July 1993 (p. 80 of AR).

On receipt of ASP Ang's letter, PSC convened a meeting to deliberate over the alleged disciplinary offences committed by ASP Ang. At that meeting, by majority decision, the members decided to dismiss ASP Ang from service. The decision was conveyed to ASP Ang videletter dated 30 December 1993 (p. 103 of AR). Significant to note that no committee of inquiry was set up. Further, it is noted that report and statement of witnesses were not supplied to ASP Ang.

With regard to the l