JUDGMENT

Azmel Maamor J:

This is an application by the plaintiff by way of a notis usul under encl. 201 seeking for an order that the defendant be committed to prison for committing several contempts of this Honourable Court. The acts of contempt of the defendant as alleged by the plaintiff are as follows:

(a) on 27.11.2000, published or distributed to the Advocates & Solicitors Disciplinary Board and the Investigating Tribunal defamatory words against the Plaintiff in breach of the Order of Injunction dated 22.1.2000; and

(b) undermined the integrity of the Judicial System and Administration of Law, Malaysia and brought the administration of law into disrespect in making the Order of Injunction and award of damages made by the High Court Judge on 22.1.2000. The trite aim of the Defendant in enclosing the documents in her letter dated 27.11.2000 is to show directly or indirectly that the judgment given by the Judge against her is wrong and should not be followed.

The brief facts of the case that led to this action are as follows. It commenced when the plaintiff wrote a letter of complaint dated 27 January 1997 to the Advocates and Solicitors Disciplinary Board complaining against t