SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img



Judgment of the Court

Introduction

1. There are five appeals before us. They arose from two civil suits,

S2-23-93-99 (the first suit) and S2-23-33-00 (the second suit).

2. Both suits were filed by the Respondent herein as plaintiff. But in this

Judgment he will be referred throughout as the Respondent. The

defendants in the respective suits are the Appellants herein and will

collectively be referred to as such where appropriate in this Judgment.

Otherwise the Appellants will be referred to by their respective

names.

6

3.As the background facts and events of these appeals are substantially

interrelated we propose to briefly state them first before dealing with

the issues and arguments.

The Parties;

4. In the first suit the first Appellant is the Bar Council, the second

Appellant was the former Chairman of the Bar Council being sued on

behalf of all the Executive Committee members of the Bar Council

including himself while the third Appellant is the Malaysian Bar. The

first and third Appellants are bodies established under the Legal Profession Act 1976 (the LPA).

5. The Respondent is a member of the Malaysian Bar paying an annual

subscription fee of RM350.00 and such further sums as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top