SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Abdul Malik Ishak J:

Introduction

[1] I was informed recently by my deputy registrar that there was an appeal pending before the Court of Appeal pertaining to my decision which I decided during the fast track system. I quickly swung into action and called for the court file.

[2] By way of an originating summons in enclosure one (1), the plaintiffs sought for the following orders (in its original Malay text):

(a) suatu pengistiharaan bahawa defendan telah memungkiri terma-terma perjanjian jual beli bertarikh 3.1.1995 dan plaintif-plaintif telah dengan sewajarnya menamatkan perjanjian jual beli tersebut pada 9.3.2001 atau pada mana-mana tarikh yang Mahkamah yang mulia berpendapat patut dan sesuai atau dalam alternatifnya suatu deklarasi bahawa perjanjian jual beli tersebut ditamatkan oleh kerana kemungkiran kontrak oleh defendan;

(b) bahawa defendan membayar plaintif-plaintif gantirugi jumlah tertentu yang akan dikira pada kadar 10% setahun ke atas harga pembelian RM298,860.10 yang ditetapkan oleh perjanjian jual beli tersebut yang dikira dari hari-hari untuk penyerahan milikan kosong iaitu daripada 3.1.1998 sehingga tarikh penamatan perjanjian jual beli tersebut iaitu pada

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top