SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

[End. 5 and End. 31]

On 25.4.2008 I granted an ex parte injunction order applied by the plaintiff on an urgency certificate [End.5] to restrain the defendant from initiating, proceeding or continuing any arbitration proceeding against the plaintiff in respect of or for the sum of RM3,337,029 or any other sum or debt alleged to be due to the defendant from the plaintiff in respect of letter of award dated 4.5.2005, the purchase order dated 14.7.2005 and purchase order dated 22.7.2005 issued by the plaintiff/POSCON/Special Triump JV to the defendant and I ordered that the inter parte hearing be held on 12.5.2008. However due to circumstances beyond the control of the parties and at times with the consent of the parties the inter parte hearing had been 5 adjourned several times. Finally on 25.9.2008 the inter parte hearing was heard. This is the ruling on that inter parte hearing.

In the affidavit affirmed by Ian Graham Stadler on 21.4.2008 filed by the plaintiff in support of the ex parte injunction application, the plaintiff averred that the defendant's claim of a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant is without merits and unjustified. The plaintiff on the other

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top