SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img



JUDGMENT

Sulaiman Daud JCA:

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the learned judge of the High Court dismissing the appellant's claim against the respondents for damages and other declaratory reliefs arising out of an alleged repudiation of a written agreement and an alleged wrongful appropriation and use of confidential information.

Background Facts

[2] The factual background can be stated briefly. The second respondent is a company limited by shares with shareholding in the first respondent's company. The principal business of the company includes the production of loaders which forms integral components of compact disc based equipments. In 1991 the second respondent sub-contracted the assembly of the loaders to a company called Singamip Industries Sdn. Bhd. ("Singamip") which had its operation in Tampoi. At the same time it appointed one of its officers by the name of Allan Netto (SP2) to supervise the assembly at the plant. Subsequently in late 1992 the second respondent appointed the appellant to replace Singamip as its sub-contractor to carry out the assembly of the loaders. After the phasing out of Singamip and until 1995, the appellant was the only sub-contractor c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top